RON97 vs RON95 arguements has been going around for quite sometimes already with some saying RON95 is shit fuel and RON97 is the better fuel and provides more power, better mileage etc.
Now that Paultan has done a RON97 vs RON95 fuel test as written in their article
here, I think I can further add on to their test.
For those lazy buggers who are lazy to click on the link to read, Paultan's team basically does a fuel consumption test between RON95 and RON97 on 2 similiar car, namely 2 VW Polo Sedan 1.6 and 2 VW Jetta 1.4 TSI with one of the Polo being filled with RON95 and the other with RON97. Its the same scenario with the Jetta too with one running RON95 and one running RON97.
The cars are then driven as "real world" as possible through a mixture of heavy traffic routes, trunk routes, highways and so on to find out what will be the consumption be at the end of the journey.
Now please click the link
here to find out more as I won't be repeating their article here.
My personal test
What I am going to show here is that, what will be the difference in power between RON95 and RON97 on the same car, which is a VW Jetta 1.4 TSI belonging to yours truly here.
For this scenario, while the car has been running RON95, I've managed to dyno the car to get an output figure for reference purpose.
For the RON97 dyno, I filled up the car with RON97 for 4 tanks before hitting the dyno again. This is so that I've completely clear out as much RON95 as possible from the car fuel tanks.
Between the last RON95 tanks and the 4 tanks of RON97, roughly about 1800 km's has passed.
And the car is running on stock ECU map. No performance remapping done. Plain stock map from factory.
Now enough of text, time to show hand.
Click to enlarge the dyno chart image.
RED is RON 97
BLUE is RON95
Now from dyno chart, between RON97 and RON95, there seems to be no significant power gain.
What you most likely gain is that with RON97, the engine delivers the power smoother compared to RON95 and thus gives the impression that RON97 "produce" more power.
Basically with a smoother engine, the engine sound or note will be less harsh and thus reinforce the impression of more power.
So whats the moral of the story?
Unless you are running performance map or a performance/race/tuned-up engine or driving a performance/sports car, there is no noticeable difference between RON95 and RON97.
So for others driving regular cars and can't decide between RON95 and RON97, the only question you need to ask yourself is , "Can my pocket afford to pay more for fuel?"
Your personal call.